|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Our Deepest Regret
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
366
   |
Posted - 2013.12.14 04:02:00 -
[1] - Quote
So, I decided to experiment today. Three random deployments, all using the Soma, using all militia parts, with the exception of an upgraded nitro booster. (There was a fourth deployment when I originally bought my somas, but I didn't realize that they didn't come with mods and was quickly dispatched by an irritated missile madrugar named Crimson gash.)
Game 1. 9-2-0
Game 2. 8-3-0
Game 3. 7-4-2 (The enemy had a railgun sica.)
Not spectacular numbers, I am only average after all. But my playstyle has always emphasized staying alive over reaping kills, so I'm quick to run if the enemy stands their ground; More reckless players are eating up the deaths and dragging their killers down with them. This thing is everything I ever wanted my 1.6 Madrugar to be. Turning sucks, but the generous charge time on the hardener more than makes up for it. I was able to stand up to a Madrugar while my hardener was active, long enough for a friendly rail gunner to rescue me!
In my missile Gunlogi, I'm more than happy to spend my time blowing up other vehicles and installations. Getting the occasional infantry kill is just a bonus. But this frickin' soma is more of a danger to the life and limb of hapless soldiers on the ground than my gunny will ever be. It's a little ridiculous and probably bears looking at. |
Our Deepest Regret
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
366
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 04:12:00 -
[2] - Quote
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote:Yeah, I spend my time hunting tanks in my Gunnlogi; I don't bother with infantry. It's a little annoying that 0sp nubs are automatically competitive with me, and if I face two unfitted rail Sicas at CQC... Well, I'm probably going to die.
I feel you. I understand the EVE mentality that better equipment doesn't necessarily mean better results, but I've seen nothing to indicate that Sicas and somas are actually inferior to Gunlogis and Madrugars. One less fitting slot? Who cares if it hits just as hard? |
Our Deepest Regret
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
366
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 04:15:00 -
[3] - Quote
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote:
Can madrigars still fit missiles and have any defense/proto turret? Thought they made it harder to fit the missiles pg wise.
I'm not up on the new madrugar fits, but yeah, crimson gash had a missile turret on his maddy.
|
Our Deepest Regret
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
367
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 05:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote:Our Deepest Regret wrote:Lorhak Gannarsein wrote:Yeah, I spend my time hunting tanks in my Gunnlogi; I don't bother with infantry. It's a little annoying that 0sp nubs are automatically competitive with me, and if I face two unfitted rail Sicas at CQC... Well, I'm probably going to die. I feel you. I understand the EVE mentality that better equipment doesn't necessarily mean better results, but I've seen nothing to indicate that Sicas and somas are actually inferior to Gunlogis and Madrugars. One less fitting slot? Who cares if it hits just as hard? I've been telling all my buddies that the ultimate in AV is a Sica fitted with 2x MLT hardeners... Get two of those and no tank is surviving.
LAWL. I just made a sica with 2 complex hardeners, 1 milita blaster, and a basic ammo expansion cache. Total cost 100,000 isk. My average take home is 160-200k per match. I could lose one of these a game, and still turn a profit.
|
Our Deepest Regret
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
367
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 05:44:00 -
[5] - Quote
DOUBLE LAWL.
I just played a pub match against Server true blood. They only had one tank on the field, and they utterly F*cked us up. I called four sicas, and a soma, and they all got sent to heaven. Maybe my concerns are exaggerated, |
Our Deepest Regret
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
367
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 05:54:00 -
[6] - Quote
hackerzilla wrote:Lorhak Gannarsein wrote:Our Deepest Regret wrote:So, I decided to experiment today. Three random deployments, all using the Soma, using all militia parts, with the exception of an upgraded nitro booster. (There was a fourth deployment when I originally bought my somas, but I didn't realize that they didn't come with mods and was quickly dispatched by an irritated missile madrugar named Crimson gash.)
Game 1. 9-2-0
Game 2. 8-3-0
Game 3. 7-4-2 (The enemy had a railgun sica.)
Not spectacular numbers, I am only average after all. But my playstyle has always emphasized staying alive over reaping kills, so I'm quick to run if the enemy stands their ground; More reckless players are eating up the deaths and dragging their killers down with them. This thing is everything I ever wanted my 1.6 Madrugar to be. Turning sucks, but the generous charge time on the hardener more than makes up for it. I was able to stand up to a Madrugar while my hardener was active, long enough for a friendly rail gunner to rescue me!
In my missile Gunlogi, I'm more than happy to spend my time blowing up other vehicles and installations. Getting the occasional infantry kill is just a bonus. But this frickin' soma is more of a danger to the life and limb of hapless soldiers on the ground than my gunny will ever be. It's a little ridiculous and probably bears looking at. Yeah, I spend my time hunting tanks in my Gunnlogi; I don't bother with infantry. It's a little annoying that 0sp nubs are automatically competitive with me, and if I face two unfitted rail Sicas at CQC... Well, I'm probably going to die. Stop being an elitist
Hey, there's nothing elitist about it. This is the Dust equivalent of sticking a needle in your ass and hitting a home run. What if starter infantry suits got stat boosted to be competitive with advanced and proto-gear? Wouldn't that cause you to raise an eyebrow?
|
|
|
| |
|